TD Bank's Anti-Money Laundering Settlement: A Wake-Up Call for Insurance Companies and AMLCOs

Weekly snippets from the Insurance Compliance Insight (ICI) Newsletter. A weekly subscription service published by an insurance compliance professional for insurance compliance professionals!


The financial services sector received a stark reminder of the importance of robust anti-money laundering (AML) programs with the recent TD Bank settlement. The bank faced combined penalties of $3.09 billion from multiple regulatory bodies, including the Department of Justice, FinCEN, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

Key aspects of the settlement include:

- Criminal penalties totaling $1.89 billion
- A $1.3 billion civil penalty for willful Bank Secrecy Act violations
- A $450 million civil penalty for BSA/AML program violations
- Multi-year independent compliance monitoring

While the scale of these penalties may seem distant from insurance industry concerns around AML, this case may also raise from red flags for insurers, particularly those distributing products through banks.

Insurance compliance officers should take note of several key considerations:

1. Distribution Agreements: Review existing agreements with banks, paying close attention to how AML responsibilities are allocated. Ensure clarity on which party is responsible for various AML tasks and processes.

2. AML Compliance Officer Involvement: Assess the level of involvement your AML compliance officer has in reviewing bank distribution contracts. Their expertise can be crucial in identifying potential risks and ensuring adequate safeguards are in place.

3. Effectiveness Testing: Evaluate your AML program's effectiveness testing procedures. This should include audits of bank contracts to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and internal policies.

4. Indirect Risk Exposure: Consider potential indirect AML risk exposure through your distribution partners. A bank's AML failures could potentially impact insurers who rely on that bank for product distribution.

This case underscores that AML risks can extend beyond an organization's direct operations. Insurance compliance officers would be wise to reassess their AML programs, focusing on potential vulnerabilities in distribution channels and partner relationships. A proactive approach to AML compliance, including regular risk assessments and program reviews, can help mitigate potential issues before they escalate.

The full article and analysis are now available in Insurance Compliance Insight, a weekly newsletter written by an expert in insurance compliance for insurance compliance officers. Contact us at Cailie@ins-compliance.com or admin@ ins-compliance.com for more information.

↓ READ MORE ↓


Previous
Previous

Is an Email from a State Insurance Regulator the next Cybersecurity Risk?

Next
Next

Part 2: Elevating Your Insurance Compliance Program: Meeting the DOJ's New Benchmarks